SRA marketing rules
What do the SRA rules say about solicitor marketing?
What the SRA Code, its guidance and the CAP Code let a solicitor's firm say and do in ads, on its website and through introducers, in plain words.
By Santiago Alvarez, Founder, Ad Hoc Digital
Last updated
The short answer
If you read one part of this page, read this.
The SRA lets solicitors advertise freely, with one hard limit and one constant test. The limit: no unsolicited approaches to members of the public who aren't current or former clients (Code paragraph 8.9). The test: all publicity must be "accurate and not misleading," including about charges (8.8).
Around that sit the rules on introducers. Clients a lead generator sends you must not have been acquired in a way the SRA would ban (5.1(e)), and in personal injury, paying for referrals is banned by statute (LASPO section 56). Ads are also policed by the Advertising Standards Authority under the CAP Code, which covers a firm's own website and social pages as well as paid ads.
This is a plain summary for marketing planning, not legal advice. Check the current rule with the SRA. We work with law firms across the US and Canada, and also in Australia and the UK.
The Code paragraphs
Paragraphs 8.6 to 8.11 of the SRA Code are the publicity rules, and they apply to firms too.
The Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs, RFLs and RSLs, in the version in effect from 11 April 2025, groups client information and publicity in 8.6 to 8.11. Paragraph 7.1 of the Code for Firms applies the same paragraphs to the firm itself.
| Paragraph | What it says | What it means for marketing |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 | Don't mislead clients, the court or others, including by allowing others to | An introducer's misleading ad can be your problem |
| 8.6 and 8.7 | Give information clients can understand, and the clearest possible information on likely cost | Fee claims on pages and in ads need context |
| 8.8 | Publicity must be accurate and not misleading, including charges and when interest is payable | The test every headline, page and listing has to pass |
| 8.9 | No unsolicited approaches to the public, except current or former clients | Cold calls, door knocking and targeted letters are out |
| 8.10 | Clients understand which services are regulated; never present an unregulated business as SRA-regulated | Matters for firms with separate businesses |
| 8.11 | Clients understand the regulatory protections available to them | Ties to the website duties in the Transparency Rules |
Two related sets of duties sit next to these: the SRA Transparency Rules on what the website must publish, covered in our Transparency Rules guide, and complaints handling in 8.2 to 8.5.
Unsolicited approaches
Ads that anyone might see are fine; approaches aimed at one person are not.
The SRA's guidance on 8.9 says it is not a ban on advertising. What's banned is a direct or specifically targeted approach to a member of the public, in person, by phone or by other means that target them individually.
- Allowed
The guidance names adverts on radio or TV, on billboards, in a local newspaper, online, or on a social media platform as not intrusive, because they don't approach anyone individually. Leaflets through doors are allowed only when the distribution isn't targeted, for example every home in a large area.
- Banned
The SRA's own example: a firm finds people online who were recently in a major road traffic accident and writes to them offering to help claim compensation. That's a targeted approach and a breach. The December 2024 warning notice adds cold calling and door knocking, by the firm or by anyone sourcing claims for it.
- Watch the gray areas
The warning notice says to be cautious about "re-marketing" techniques where a third party tries to re-engage people who first inquired with them, because further approaches may still be unsolicited. It also points firms to UK GDPR and PECR, which govern emails, texts and data alongside the SRA rule.
So Google search ads and Facebook or Instagram ads are inside the SRA's own list of acceptable channels. As an example of the channel from outside the UK, not a UK result, one of our personal injury clients outside the UK ran a dedicated rideshare campaign on Facebook and Instagram that brought in a case which settled for $1.5 million. Our Meta ads service runs those campaigns.
Lead generators and introducers
You answer for how an introducer found the client, and in personal injury you can't pay for the referral at all.
Paragraph 5.1 requires clients to be told about referral interests and fee sharing, fee sharing agreements in writing, and that no client referred by an introducer was acquired in a way that would breach SRA rules if the introducer were regulated.
- 5.1(a) and (b): tell clients about any financial interest in a referral and any fee sharing arrangement relevant to their matter.
- 5.1(c): fee sharing agreements in writing.
- 5.1(d): no referral payments for clients in criminal proceedings.
- 5.1(e): the introducer's methods must meet SRA standards, so an introducer that cold calls taints the client it sends.
- 5.2: if it looks like a referral fee to the SRA, it's treated as one unless you show otherwise.
LASPO 2012 section 56 bans paying or receiving referral fees for "prescribed legal business": claims for damages for personal injury or death. Its definition of a referral is the part marketers need to read. A referral happens when someone other than the client provides information a provider of legal services would need to make the client an offer, and "payment" includes any form of consideration except reasonable hospitality. Paying per injury lead with the person's contact details fits that description closely.
The December 2024 warning notice spells out the checks. You must be able to show an introducer didn't acquire clients through cold calls, door knocking or other targeted approaches, review the publicity third parties use, and carry out regular spot checks asking new clients how, and by whom, they were contacted. Our guide on whether law firms can pay for leads compares the UK position with other countries.
Comparison sites and listings
The SRA says comparison sites are allowed, and flat listing fees aren't referral fees.
The SRA's September 2024 guidance on comparison websites says signing up and giving a site information about your services and charges is allowed and isn't an unsolicited approach under 8.9.
For personal injury, the SRA gives two models it doesn't view as breaching LASPO: a subscription fee to be listed, paid whether or not leads arrive, and a fee for each consumer sent a quote, where the firm isn't given names and contact details to make a direct offer. The line is the same as in section 56: paying for the person's details is the problem.
Everything on a listing still has to meet 8.8. If a comparison site shows your prices, they have to be the prices you charge, with the same detail the Transparency Rules ask for on your own site.
What ads can claim
"No win, no fee" must be explained, and "up to £X" must be provable.
The SRA's warning notice lists the claims that most often mislead, and the ASA's January 2026 guidance on mass legal claims ads shows how the CAP Code applies them.
- What the SRA lists
Publicity must not mislead about prospects of success, likely award levels, other claimants' feedback, awards or credentials, or ombudsman and compensation schemes people can use for free. If marketing highlights "no win, no fee", it should explain what that means, including when a client could still owe costs.
- What the ASA expects
Ads saying "no win, no fee" should set out, in the ad or at least on the landing page before anything is signed, how fees work in a successful claim, including the percentage deducted from compensation. Headline figures like "up to £10,000" must be substantiated and shown as before deductions. An online e-signature must say plainly that it forms a binding contract.
- Lead generators must say so
The ASA ruled against a lead generation site that didn't make clear it sold leads on to a law firm. If you're a lead generator, say so early and prominently; if all leads go to one firm, name it.
- Substantiation
CAP Code 3.7 requires documentary evidence for objective claims before an ad runs. "Over 2,000 claims settled" needs the file count in hand first.
The CAP Code's scope covers paid search listings and, under clause I(h), a firm's claims on its own website and in other non-paid-for space it controls, such as its social pages. So the ASA and the SRA can both look at the same landing page. More on the ad copy side in our ad copy rules guide.
Reviews and titles
Ask for reviews, never fake or bury them, and only solicitors and barristers use those titles.
The SRA's online reviews guidance encourages firms to ask clients for reviews and reply to them without disclosing confidential information. Consumer law sets the outer limits.
The DMCC Act 2024 makes fake consumer reviews, and reviews that conceal an incentive, a banned practice. CAP Code 3.44 to 3.47 bans fake reviews in ads, requires incentivised reviews to be flagged, bans showing positives while hiding negatives, and requires evidence that a testimonial is genuine. The SRA also says not to pressure clients or review sites to take down a negative review. Our guides on asking for reviews and testimonials cover the detail.
On titles, section 21 of the Solicitors Act 1974 makes it an offence for an unqualified person to pretend to be a solicitor or use a description implying it, and section 181 of the Legal Services Act 2007 does the same for barristers. We didn't find an SRA rule reserving "specialist"; the test is 8.8, so any specialism claim has to be accurate and provable.
A this-week check
Six checks for a solicitor firm's marketing.
This is the order we review a firm's marketing in, whatever the country: the claims first, then how leads arrive, then the pages ads send people to.
List every source of new clients
Ads, listings, comparison sites, referrers and any lead generator. For each third party, write down how they find people and how you're charged.
Check personal injury payments against section 56
Any payment tied to receiving a named person's details for an injury claim needs a hard look before the next invoice.
Start spot checks
Ask new clients from third parties how they were first contacted and by whom, and keep a note. The warning notice expects it.
Read every "no win, no fee" line
The landing page explains the percentage deducted and when the client could still pay costs, before any signature.
Find every number
Success rates, settlement figures, "up to" amounts and claim counts each need documentary evidence on file.
Check the website duties
SRA number, digital badge, complaints procedure and, for the listed services, prices. The Transparency Rules guide has the list.
A worked example
A hypothetical Manchester injury ad, rewritten for the SRA and the ASA.
This is an illustration with an invented firm, not a client.
The ad still runs on social media, which the SRA's guidance accepts as non-targeted advertising. The changes are all about accuracy. More on that practice on our personal injury marketing page.
Common mistakes
Where firms go wrong.
These are the patterns the SRA and ASA texts warn about most directly.
Buying injury leads with contact details
LASPO section 56 treats passing someone's details for an injury claim, for payment, as a referral. A flat listing fee is a different model.
Trusting an introducer's word
"It's not regulated by the SRA" is no defence, the warning notice says. You need evidence of how clients were acquired.
Hiding fee terms behind an FAQ
The ASA says burying "no win, no fee" deductions in FAQs or retainer documents breaches the CAP Code.
Messaging past inquirers through a third party
The warning notice flags "re-marketing" by third parties as a possible unsolicited approach.
Showing only the five-star reviews
CAP Code 3.46 treats suppressing negatives or giving positives more prominence as misleading.
Real results
What this looked like for real firms.
We have no UK client results to show. This is an example of the channel from outside the UK, labeled as such: social ads, which the SRA lists as acceptable non-targeted advertising.
Identifying details are anonymized to protect our clients. Individual result, not a promise or prediction of any specific outcome for your firm.
FAQ
Questions lawyers ask us.
Straight answers to the questions that come up most.
Can solicitors advertise on Google and Facebook?
Yes. The SRA's guidance on paragraph 8.9 lists online and social media adverts as acceptable because they don't approach anyone individually. The ad must still be accurate and not misleading under 8.8, and the CAP Code applies to paid search listings and to the firm's own pages. Our Google Ads service writes to those rules.
Can a solicitor cold call potential clients?
No. Paragraph 8.9 bans unsolicited approaches to members of the public who aren't current or former clients, and the December 2024 warning notice names cold calling and door knocking. The ban reaches clients sent by a lead generator or claims management company that used those methods.
Can I pay for personal injury leads in England and Wales?
Not for referrals. LASPO section 56 bans paying for the referral of personal injury or death claims, and a referral includes passing on the information you'd need to offer the client your services. The SRA says flat listing fees and per-quote fees without contact details don't breach section 56. Check any per-lead model with the SRA first.
Is "no win, no fee" allowed in solicitor ads?
Yes, if it's explained. The SRA says marketing that highlights it should explain what it means and when a client could still face costs. The ASA expects the ad or landing page to show how fees work, including the percentage taken from compensation, before anyone signs.
Can solicitors ask clients for reviews?
Yes. The SRA's online reviews guidance encourages it, for example by sending a link, and says replies must not disclose confidential information. Don't offer incentives without disclosure, write reviews, or pressure anyone to remove a negative one. Our reviews rules guide covers the detail.
Can I call myself a specialist?
We didn't find an SRA rule that reserves the word. The test is paragraph 8.8: publicity must be accurate and not misleading, and CAP Code 3.7 requires evidence for objective claims. If you use it, be able to show why. The lawyer advertising rules hub compares how other countries treat the word.
Can you run marketing for a UK firm?
Yes. We work with law firms across the US and Canada, and also in Australia and the UK. We check every ad and page against the firm's own regulator before it runs. To talk through your firm, schedule a consultation.
Where we do this
The services this guide touches.
What this looks like when we run it for a firm, with a demo for your practice on each page.
Sources
Where these facts come from.
Official pages we read when writing this page. Platforms and rules change, so check the current version before you act on any of it. This is marketing guidance, not legal advice.
- Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs, RFLs and RSLs
- Solicitors Regulation Authority, Code of Conduct for Firms
- Solicitors Regulation Authority, Unsolicited approaches (advertising) to members of the public
- Solicitors Regulation Authority, Marketing your services to members of the public (warning notice)
- Solicitors Regulation Authority, Comparison websites: how to use them effectively
- Solicitors Regulation Authority, Online reviews: how to engage with them
- legislation.gov.uk, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, section 56
- Advertising Standards Authority, CAP Code section 3: Misleading advertising
- Advertising Standards Authority, CAP Code: Scope of the Code
- Advertising Standards Authority, Ads for mass legal compensation claims: four pitfalls to avoid
- legislation.gov.uk, Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, Schedule 20, paragraph 13
- legislation.gov.uk, Solicitors Act 1974, section 21
- legislation.gov.uk, Legal Services Act 2007, section 181
Want a second pair of eyes on this?
Book a free 30-minute call. Tell us how cases come in today, and we'll tell you straight what we'd change, and whether we can help.
